C++

Publishing C++/CLI on LeanPub

I came across LeanPub ¹ a few months back. I believe it was through hanselman² – blog, video or something. I liked LeanPub instantly because of a couple of reasons.

• It supports writing in markdown³ and I love markdown.
• There is a large collection and variety of books including technical books and material, some of which are free too.
• In case you are not a professional writer, the publication process encourages you with the feeling as if you are one.

I hadn’t written/published any lengthy material in a long time except the C+/CLI Primer on CodeProject⁴. Why not publish same, I thought, and actually published⁵. I wasn’t even expecting any response from anyone since the material was on C++/CLI, a language that gave me the impression that I was the only one using it at the time I published on CodeProject. 😀 I am really impressed that the material topped more than 50 downloads in about three months since it was published. Heck, a couple of them even paid despite the fact that the material is free. Not only am I humbled by this encouraging gesture but I am also convinced that C++/CLI is still being pursued and will continue to live – production, academic or as a pet language. Go grab your copy of the booklet – C++/CLI Primer. It’s free!

Publishing C++/CLI on LeanPub

I came across LeanPub ¹ a few months back. I believe it was through hanselman² – blog, video or something. I liked LeanPub instantly because of a couple of reasons.

• It supports writing in markdown³ and I love markdown.
• There is a large collection and variety of books including technical books and material, some of which are free too.
• In case you are not a professional writer, the publication process encourages you with the feeling as if you are one.

I hadn’t written/published any lengthy material in a long time except the C+/CLI Primer on CodeProject⁴. Why not publish same, I thought, and actually published⁵. I wasn’t even expecting any response from anyone since the material was on C++/CLI, a language that gave me the impression that I was the only one using it at the time I published on CodeProject. 😀 I am really impressed that the material topped more than 50 downloads in about three months since it was published. Heck, a couple of them even paid despite the fact that the material is free. Not only am I humbled by this encouraging gesture but I am also convinced that C++/CLI is still being pursued and will continue to live – production, academic or as a pet language. Go grab your copy of the booklet – C++/CLI Primer. It’s free!

final, const and beyond

What are your thoughts on the following piece of code?

public String someGibberishMethod() {
	int length = someMethodReturningLength();
	int sum = 0;

	for (int index = 0; index < length; ++index) {
	   // some code that updates the sum variable
	}

	SomeClass someClass = new SomeClass(sum);
	int sumValueInsideSomeClass = someClass.getSumValue();
	// use someText, maybe log or something

	String someText = someClass.doSomeOperation(/*some parameters*/);
	// use someText, maybe log or something
	return someText;
}

An Unfair World of Tuples, Anons., var and auto

It all began when I wanted to return more than one value from one of the methods. Although my attempts ended futile, it was fun exploring and musing how things could have been.

There are at least a couple of options to return multiple values from a method:-

1. return an instance of a class that holds the values
2. return a tuple

Crazy Brackets – [](){}();

What does this cryptic bracket sequence mean? What programming language is it? Is it valid syntax? If there is even a weak chance of this syntax being valid? If so, what does it mean?

Alright, alright, alright! It is C++. That would calm most people; with all their love (pun) for C++. Specifically, it is C++0x. Amongst many other features that we have been waiting for, C++0x gives us the power of lambdas.

Quiz – Where am I ?

The question is, in C++, how do detect if an object is allocated on the stack or heap.

On Windows, the stack address is in the range of 0x80000000. If the address of the variable is in this range, then you could say that the object is allocated on the stack; else it is allocated on the heap. This technique of detecting is not preferable since it may not work on other operating systems (such as linux), and deals with the platform specific information making it a non-portable solution.

Thinking Currying

Currying is a mathematical concept based on lambda calculus. It is a technique of operating on a function (taking multiple arguments) by splitting and capable of chaining into a series of single argument functions. It is very similar to what a human would attempt to do on paper. For example, if you have to add numbers 1 through 10, what would you do? Class II mathematics -0 in hand, 1 in the mind, add 0 and 1, so 1 in the mind, then 2 in the hand, … up to 10. So we compute the addition with one argument at a time. More ...

Quiz – (Journey through templates, SFINAE and specialization) !!!

template<typename A, typename B>
class TClass
{
public: TClass()
        {
        }

        // Overload #1
public: std::string SomeMethod(A a, B b)
        {
           std::ostringstream ostr;
           ostr << a << "-" << b;
           return ostr.str();
        }

        // Overload #2
public: std::string SomeMethod(B b, A a)
        {
           std::ostringstream ostr;
           ostr << b << "-" << a;
           return ostr.str();
        }
};

So that is a template class with SomeMethod overloads. Why would somebody write such a class? Imagine it is an adder class, and the method overloads could used to add with parameters specified in either order. Following is the way one could use the above (based on the adder example):-

Type Safe Logger

Article co-authored with Sanjeev, and published on CodeProject

PROBLEM

Every application logs a whole bunch of diagnostic messages, primarily for (production) debugging, to the console or the standard error device or to files. There are so many other destinations where the logs can be written to. Irrespective of the destination that each application must be able to configure, the diagnostic log message and the way to generate the message is of our interest now. So we are in need of a logger class that can behave transparent to the logging destination. That should not be a problem, it would be fun to design that.

Typesafe Logger

This article was co-authored with Sanjeev, and published on CodeProject

PROBLEM

Every application logs a whole bunch of diagnostic messages, primarily for (production) debugging, to the console or the standard error device or to files. There are so many other destinations where the logs can be written to. Irrespective of the destination that each application must be able to configure, the diagnostic log message and the way to generate the message is of our interest now. So we are in need of a logger class that can behave transparent to the logging destination. That should not be a problem, it would be fun to design that.

Simple Array Class For C++

This is a simple array like class for C++, which can be used as a safe wrapper for accessing a block of memory pointed by a bare pointer.

CComPtr Misconception !!!

This is about a killer bug identified by our chief software engineer in our application. What was devised for ease of use and write smart code ended up in this killer defect due to improper perception. Ok, let us go!

CComPtr is a template class in ATL designed to wrap the discrete functionality of COM object management – AddRef and Release. Technically it is a smart pointer for a COM object.

Extension Methods – A Polished C++ Feature

Extension Methods is an excellent feature in C# 3.0. It is a mechanism by which new methods can be exposed from an existing type (interface or class) without directly adding the method to the type. Why do we need extension methods anyway ? Ok, that is the big story of lamba and LINQ. But from a conceptual standpoint, the extension methods establish a mechanism to extend the public interface of a type. The compiler is smart enough to make the method a part of the public interface of the type. Yeah, that is what it does, and the intellisense is very cool in making us believe that. It is cleaner and easier (for the library developers and for us programmers even) to add extra functionality (methods) not provided in the type. That is the intent. And we know that was exercised extravagantly in LINQ. The IEnumerable was extended with a whole lot set of methods to aid the LINQ design. Remember the Where, Select etc methods on IEnumerable. More ...