What does this cryptic bracket sequence mean? What programming language is it? Is it valid syntax? If there is even a weak chance of this syntax being valid? If so, what does it mean?
Alright, alright, alright! It is C++. That would calm most people; with all their love (pun) for C++. Specifically, it is C++0x. Amongst many other features that we have been waiting for, C++0x gives us the power of lambdas.
The formal definition of a lambda in C++0x is as follows:-
[capture_mode] (parameters) mutable throw() -> return_type {
body
}
A lambda may capture one or more variables in scope by value or by reference, or it may capture none. Specifying return_type is not necessary if the type can be inferred or is void.
For instance, a std::for_each‘s functor based code could be inlined with a lambda as follows:-
std::for_each(v.begin(), v.end(), [](int x) {
cout << x << std::endl;
});
A lambda definition could be assigned to a variable and then used or invoked later.
auto lessthan = [](int left, int right) {
return left < right;
};
In the above code, lessthan represents a function that takes two int parameters, and returns a bool. And it can be invoked as lessthan(2, 3), which returns true. The cute thing about a lambda is that it can invoked directly right after its definition. The following code defines a lambda (which takes two ints and returns a bool) and invokes it right away.
[](int left, int right) {
return left < right;
} (2, 3);
Coming back to our initial question now! You should have guessed it by now.
The bracket sequence –
[](){}();– is nothing but a definition followed by a call (right away) to a lambda taking no arguments and returning nothing.
To end with a quote, C++ code is like Calligraphy. In other words, it is beautiful to those who understand it, while cryptic to others.
P.S: Bear with me if calligraphy is not an appropriate analogy.
